Execution petition enforcing an arbitral award dated 08.05.2020 whose operation was stayed by the Division Bench in a pending Section 37 appeal. Court disposed of the enforcement proceedings as futile while the appeal was under consideration, granting liberty to refile after the appeal is decided.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~3
MEERA GOYAL .....Judgement Debtor
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA O R D E R % 03.10.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2024 at 14:41:07
been stayed, no purpose would be served by keeping the present proceedings pending while the matter is under consideration by the Division Bench. 4. The present petition is accordingly disposed of. However, liberty is granted to the decree holder to file afresh, subject to the orders that may be passed by the Division Bench seized of FAO(OS). 09/2024. All rights and contentions of the decree holder are expressly reserved.
SACHIN DATTA, J
OCTOBER 3, 2024/ UK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/10/2024 at 14:41:07
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Meera Goyal v. Priti Saraf FAO(OS) 09/2024Referred
3 provisions across 1 enactments
Priti Saraf
Meera Goyal
Sachin Datta
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
