The court disposed of the execution petition after noting that the decree had been satisfied in full through the release of deposited amounts to the decree holder, subject to security pending the judgment debtor's pending appeal.
Execution petition disposed of with observations.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~10
* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JOHN TINSON AND CO. PVT. LTD. ..... Decree Holder Through: Ms. Shyel Trehan, Mr. Rohan Poddar & Mr. Vignesh Roy, Advocates.
versus
BANK OF INDIA & ANR. ..... Judgement Debtors Through: Mr. Agniwesh Singh, Advocate.
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN
O R D E R
% 15.04.2024
full.
Page 1 of 2
EX.P. 59/2020
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/04/2024 at 12:40:14
Court, pursuant to the orders of the Division Bench, and will abide by the final decision in the appeal.
PRATEEK JALAN, J
APRIL 15, 2024 ‘pv’/
Page 2 of 2
EX.P. 59/2020
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/04/2024 at 12:40:14
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the decree under execution has been satisfied?
JOHN TINSON AND CO. PVT. LTD.
BANK OF INDIA
ANR.
Prateek Jalan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
