Decree holders sought execution of possession of property. Counsel stated possession had already been handed over, so the execution petitions were withdrawn with liberty to approach the court again if required.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~27 & 28
GAUTAM CHOPRA AND ANR. .....Decree Holders Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Senior Advocate with Ms. Ruchira V. Arora and Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates.
versus
KAMRUDDIN SAIFI .....Judgement Debtor
Through:
GAUTAM CHOPRA AND ANR. .....Decree Holders Through: Mr. Rajesh Yadav, Senior Advocate with Ms. Ruchira V. Arora and Mr. Dhananjay Mehlawat, Advocates. versus
RAHISUDDIN .....Judgement Debtor
Through: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 16.10.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 23:21:51
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, J
OCTOBER 16, 2024 S. Zakir
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 23:21:51
Gautam Chopra and Anr.
Kamruddin Saifi
Rahisuddin
Subramonium Prasad
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
