Disposed
Shyam Sharma v. Ram Sharma
Delhi HCEX.P./23/2024
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
A judgment debtor sought execution of a decree regarding possession of a plot. The respondent confirmed no obstruction and recorded withdrawal of the petition. The court disposed of the matter as not pressed.
What did the court decide?
Petition disposed of as not pressed.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~25
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- EX.P. 23/2024 & EX.APPL.(OS) 492/2024 SHYAM SHARMA .....Judgment Debtor No. 2 Through: Mr. Prem Garg, Adv. alongwith Judgment Debtor No. 2 in person.
¶4
Versus
¶5
RAM SHARMA .....Decree Holder Through: Decree Holder / Ram Sharma (through VC)
¶6
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN O R D E R
¶7
% 16.07.2024
¶8
- The present execution petition has been filed by Judgment Debtor No.2 seeking execution of the decree dated 12.12.2011 which was passed in terms of the Mediation Settlement Agreement dated 24.11.2011.
¶9
- The Decree Holder (Ram Sharma), who has joined through VC submits that the parties have already taken possession of their respective portions and the plot measuring – 34 ft x 40 ft at RZ- F1/3A, Nasirpur Road, Mahavir Enclave, Palam, New Delh -110045 (North-10 ft Road, SouthCommon Passage & Other’s Property, East- Ram Sharma’s Open Plot and West- Mr. Ashok Sharma’s Open Plot) as stated in the Settlement Agreement dated 24.11.2021 has fallen to the share of the judgment debtor no.2/petitioner (Shyam Sharma).
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Shyam Sharma
- respondent
Ram Sharma
Coram
AI extract
Vikas Mahajan
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court