Disposed
Uma Hada v. Mr. Sunil Gupta
Delhi HCEX.P./102/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
This order closed an execution petition where the judgment-debtor disclosed insolvency proceedings and appointment of an IRP, granting the decree-holder liberty to revive the petition later.
What did the court decide?
Execution petition closed; liberty granted to resume upon arising of cause of action.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~16
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- EX.P. 102/2022, EX.APPL.(OS) 807/2023, EX.APPL.(OS) 83/2024
¶4
- UMA HADA ..... Decree Holder Through: Mr Aditya Malhotra, Ms Tripti Kapoor and Mr Rudraksh Kaushal, Advs.
¶5
versus
¶6
MR. SUNIL GUPTA ..... Judgement Debtor Through: Mr Vijay Tangri, Adv.
¶7
- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH O R D E R
¶8
- % 08.04.2024
¶9
- It is stated by Mr Tangri, learned counsel for the judgment-debtor that insolvency proceedings have been initiated against judgment-debtor and an IRP has been appointed. He discloses the name of IRP as Mr Ashish Gupta and assures that the details will be provided to the learned counsel for the decree-holder within a period of one week from today. His assurance is taken on record.
¶10
- The decree-holder is at liberty to register all his claims against the IRP in accordance with law.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- petitioner
Uma Hada
- respondent
Mr. Sunil Gupta
Coram
AI extract
Jasmeet Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court