The Court disposed of a civil suit based on a settlement agreement. The settlement terms were accepted as part of the decree, and the plaintiffs were directed to receive a full refund of court fees under the Court Fees Act.
Suit decreed in terms of settlement; full court fee refund ordered; all pending applications and future dates disposed of.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~22
versus
MS. MINAXI RAJIV SOBTI .....Defendant Through: Mr. Dattatray Vyas and Ms. Sanidhya Sonthalia, Advocates
Page 1 of 3
CS(OS) 430/2023
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2024 at 15:43:57
has joined the proceedings via Video Conferencing. Parties have been identified by their respective counsels. Parties have confirmed the terms of the settlement agreement and agreed to remain bound them.
CS(OS) 430/2023
Page 2 of 3
CS(OS) 430/2023
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2024 at 15:43:57
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J
JULY 4, 2024/ rhc/ms
Page 3 of 3
CS(OS) 430/2023
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 22/07/2024 at 15:43:57
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the suit be disposed of in terms of the mutual settlement agreement filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.
Whether the court fees paid by the plaintiffs should be refunded as the suit was settled before the framing of issues.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
High Court of Judicature at Madras v. M.C. Subramaniam & OrsApplied¶21
High Court of Judicature at Madras v. M.C. Subramaniam & Ors [(2021) 3 SCC 560] · Who else cites this
3 provisions across 2 enactments
DR. AMARJEET DABAS & ANR.
MS. MINAXI RAJIV SOBTI
MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
