Suit disposed of in terms of a settlement between the parties; contempt application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A withdrawn. Court recorded the settlement was voluntary and bound parties to it.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
Through: Mr. Manish Vats, Adv.
versus
SH. HARIKESH KUMAR ..... Defendant
Through: Mr. Babulal Yadav, Adv. for D1 Mr. Samarpal Singh, Adv. for D2 to 4
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JASMEET SINGH
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 16:32:45
JASMEET SINGH, J
JANUARY 30, 2024/DM
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 16:32:45
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the suit should be disposed of in terms of the settlement dated 14.12.2023 under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC?
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Kumar
Harikesh Kumar
Jasmeet Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A civil suit filed on the original side of a High Court exercising ordinary original civil jurisdiction.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
