“14. That the contents of Paragraph No.14 are false, malafide, wrong and denied. That it is humbly submitted, Defendant has no intention to create any such third-party rights. It is incorrect to state that the Defendant is exploring ways to create third party rights and interests in the suit property. Further it is also malafide and wrong to state that, the Defendant is in negotiations for sale or leasing out the suit property to defeat the rights of the Plaintiff. It is submitted, the Defendant has never denied and it is not disputed that vide the will of the father dated 09.04.2018, the Plaintiff is entitle to 1 acre of the suit property [which is around 40% but not 40%]. That the Plaintiff herself has been keen to sell her share of the suit property. That it is submitted, the Plaintiff has messaged Defendant about this on few occasions. Initially defendant was not keen to sell but seeing the concern/desperation of the Plaintiff to sell the suit property, the Defendant had agreed and therefore without prejudice to his rights and safeguarding the Plaintiff’s rights contacted agents to look for interested party with no intention to defeat the right of the Plaintiff. Now the plaintiff has again changed her stance. It is again reiterated, Defendant has never denied and it is not disputed that vide the will of the father dated 09.04.2018, the Plaintiff is entitle to 1 acre of the suit property [which is around 40% but not 40%]. That it is further submitted, the request that the Defendant had made was that the Tehsildar should do the measurements and draw the maps in presence of both parties in Delhi, as per Annexure-A of the will.”
