Allowed

Pernod Ricard India Private Limited v. Frost Falcon Distilleries Limited

Delhi HC11 Sept 2024CS(COMM)/94/2021

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Application for modification of an order dated 11th September, 2024 which inadvertently recorded the plaintiff's trademark as registered, when it was actually pending. Court allowed application to modify paragraph 3 of the impugned order.

What did the court decide?

Application allowed for modification of paragraph 3 of the order dated 11th September, 2024 to reflect the pending status of the trademark application.

Pernod Ricard India Private Limited Vs Frost… — Civil Procedure and Limitation | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~75

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 94/2021 & I.A. 42708/2024

¶4

PERNOD RICARD INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Sambhav Jain, Ms. Reha Mohan, Mr. Sidhant Oberoi, Ms. Akanksha Majumdar, Advocates (M:9873868816) versus FROST FALCON DISTILLERIES LIMITED .....Defendant Through: None. CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶5

O R D E R % 21.10.2024

¶6

I.A. 42708/2024 (Application for Modification of order)

¶7

The present application has been filed under Section 152 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), seeking clarification/modification of the order dated 11^th September, 2024.

¶8

Learned counsel for the plaintiff submits that the plaintiff had filed the present suit for permanent injunction restraining infringement of trade mark, copyright, passing off, unfair competition, damages/rendition of accounts and delivery up etc. against the defendant.

¶9

It is submitted that the suit of the plaintiff had been decreed in favour of the plaintiff, and disposed of vide order dated 11^th September, 2024. 4. It is submitted that the suit was decreed on the ground that the defendant had submitted that it was ready to give up the word ‘PRIDE’ in the impugned trade mark ‘CASINOS PRIDE’ and was also ready to change

¶10

This is a digitally signed order.

¶11

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/10/2024 at 12:51:54

¶12

the trade dress/ packaging thereof, so as to not infringe or be deceptively similar, to the trade dress/packaging of the plaintiff’s products.

¶13

It is submitted that in Paragraph 3 of the order dated 11^th September, 2024, it has inadvertently been recorded that the plaintiff’s trademark ‘PRIDE’ is registered. However, it is submitted that the plaintiff’s application for registration of the said mark, i.e., Application No. 4780328 dated 14^th December, 2020 in Class 33, is currently still pending registration. 6. Considering the submissions made before this Court, the order dated 11^th September, 2024 is modified to read in Paragraph 3 that “the plaintiff has applied for registration of its mark ‘PRIDE’ as a trademark in the year 2020 under Class 33”.

¶14

Noting the aforesaid, the present application is allowed and is accordingly disposed of.

¶15

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶16

OCTOBER 21, 2024

¶17

¶18

This is a digitally signed order.

¶19

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 24/10/2024 at 12:51:54

Pernod Ricard India Private Limited v. Frost Falcon Distilleries Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pernod Ricard India Private Limited v. Frost Falcon Distilleries Limited

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Paragon Cable India & Anr. Vs Essee Networks Private Limited & Ors.

Kaira District Cooperative Milk Producers Union Ltd. & Anr. Vs Bio Logic and Psychotropics India Private Ltd. & Anr.

Glaxosmithkline Pharmaceuticals Limited Vs Mr. Harshit Kumar Jain

Tata Sons Private Limited Vs Tatabeauty Cosmetics Ltd.

Itc Limited & Anr. Vs J and K Heritage Resorts Private Limited & Anr.

M/S Steelbird Hi-Tech India Ltd. Vs Mr. Ashish Dhall & Anr.

Renu Promoters Pvt. Ltd. Vs Govind Radhe Real Estate Private Limited & Ors.

Campus Activewear Ltd. Vs Mr. Subhash Chand Bansal & Ors.

Paragon Cable India & Anr. Vs Essee Networks Private Limited & Ors.

Kaira District Cooperative Milk Producers Union Ltd. & Anr. Vs Bio Logic and Psychotropics India Private Ltd. & Anr.

Ramdas Vaishnav Vs Nemichand Mehta and Ors.

Wellcon Animal Health Pvt. Ltd. Vs M/S. Welldorf Labs & Ors.

Itc Limited & Anr. Vs J and K Heritage Resorts Private Limited & Anr.

Campus Activewear Ltd. Vs Mr. Subhash Chand Bansal & Ors.