Disposed

Kalyani Innerwear Private Limited v. Sunny Trading Co. & Anr.

Delhi HC19 Sept 2024CS(COMM)/894/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Suit over the KALYANI trademark settled between the parties. Defendants acknowledged plaintiff's ownership and validity of the mark and undertook not to use KAVYANI or similar marks, paid token damages of ₹1 lac. Suit decreed in terms of settlement; full court fee refund directed; application and suit disposed of.

What did the court decide?

Suit decreed in terms of settlement; certificate of refund of full court fees to plaintiff; decree sheet to be drawn up.

Kalyani Innerwear Private Limited Vs Sunny Trading Co… — Intellectual Property | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~52

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 894/2022 & I.A. 39850/2024

¶4

KALYANI INNERWEAR PRIVATE LIMITED .....Plaintiff

¶5

Through: Mr. A.K. Goel, Adv. M: 9873815146

¶6

versus

¶7

SUNNY TRADING CO. & ANR. .....Defendants

¶8

Through: Mr. Umesh Mishra, Mr. Satish Kumar and Mr. Amit Kumar, Advs. M: 9868401295

¶9

Email: [email protected]

¶10

CORAM:

¶11

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA

¶12

O R D E R % 19.09.2024

¶13

I.A. 39850/2024 (Application under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with

¶14

Section 151 of CPC)

¶15

The present application has been filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) on behalf of both the parties.

¶16

Learned counsel appearing for the parties submit that the plaintiff and the defendants have reached an amicable settlement.

¶17

Both the parties confirm the terms of the settlement and pray that decree be passed in terms of the settlement, as contained in the present application.

¶18

This Court has perused the terms of the settlement, as contained in the present application, and finds the same to be lawful.

¶19

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 11:55:29

¶20

In terms of the settlement, the defendants have acknowledged that the plaintiff is the owner of the trademark/label KALYANI and

¶21

and packaging thereof, and have admitted the validity of the plaintiff’s aforesaid trademark/label KALYANI and

¶22

and packaging thereof, and KALYANI formative marks. The defendants have also acknowledged that the plaintiff is the registered proprietor of the trademark KALYANI.

¶23

Further, the defendants undertake that the defendants shall not use the

¶24

mark KAVYANI, or any other

¶25

mark/label/packaging, which is deceptively similar to the plaintiff’s trade

¶26

mark/label/packaging of KALYANI and and

¶27

KALYANI formative marks in relation to Bra, Panties and/or other readymade garments and clothing and/or allied/cognate goods/services and/or

¶28

¶29

goods/services having same trade connection.

¶30

In terms of the settlement between the parties, defendants have paid token damages of ₹1 lac by way of cheque to the plaintiff, receipt of which is confirmed by learned counsel appearing for the plaintiff.

¶31

Accordingly, the suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants in terms of the settlement terms, which are contained in the present application, which shall form part of the decree.

¶32

In view of the fact that parties have arrived at a settlement, the Registry is directed to issue a certificate of refund of full Court Fees to the plaintiff.

¶33

Let decree sheet be drawn up.

¶34

The present suit, along with the pending application, is disposed of.

¶35

The next date, i.e., 26^th September, 2024, before the Joint Registrar (Judicial), stands cancelled.

¶36

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶37

SEPTEMBER 19, 2024/kr

¶38

This is a digitally signed order.

¶39

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 11:55:29

Kalyani Innerwear Private Limited v. Sunny Trading Co. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kalyani Innerwear Private Limited v. Sunny Trading Co. & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Polotrips India Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Karnataka Bank Limted & Ors.

Nandi Infratech P. Ltd. Vs Himanshu Bhandari & Ors.

Omirico Limited & Anr. Vs Pjsc Sberbank & Anr.

Skoda Auto a S Vs Mr Virender Yadav Trading as Super Cool Trading Co. and Sheetal Enterprises & Anr.

Pioneer Overseas Corporation Vs M/S Evercrop Agro Science & Anr.

Prj Family Private Trust & Ors. Vs Raseel Gujral Ansal & Ors.

Sunil Mittal & Anr. Vs Mohammad Hanif Khan

Ms Robert Bosch Gmbh Vs Mrs Rosy Sethi

Nandi Infratech P. Ltd. Vs Himanshu Bhandari & Ors.

Avon Cycles Ltd. Vs Manish Raj Goyal and Anr.

Skoda Auto a S Vs Mr Virender Yadav Trading as Super Cool Trading Co. and Sheetal Enterprises & Anr.

Mannan R Datta Vs Registrar Trademarks

Mankind Pharma Limited Vs Chandra Mani Tiwari & Anr.

Marion Biotech Pvt. Ltd. Vs Pharmison Valentes Pharma Pvt. Ltd.