Allowed

Mankind Pharma Limited v. Humankind Health and Hygiene Private Limited & Ors.

Delhi HC2 Dec 2024CS(COMM)/865/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a suit for trademark infringement, the High Court of Delhi, on a joint compromise application by the plaintiff and defendants, held the settlement lawful and decreed the suit in terms of the settlement agreement.

What did the court decide?

The suit was decreed in favour of the plaintiff in terms of the settlement agreement and prayers (a) to (f) of the plaint.

Mankind Pharma Limited Vs Humankind Health and Hygiene… — Intellectual Property | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~33

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CS(COMM) 865/2024 & I.A. 46878/2024 MANKIND PHARMA LIMITED .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Ankur Dangal, Mr. Ankit Arvin and Mr. Kiratraj Sadana, Advs.

¶4

versus

¶5

HUMANKIND HEALTH AND HYGIENE PRIVATE LIMITED & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Dhanur Dhar Singh Rana, Adv. for R-1, 2 and 3.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA O R D E R

¶8

% 02.12.2024

¶9

I.A. 46878/2024

¶10

The present is a joint application under Order XXIII Rule 3, read with Section 151 of Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), filed jointly by the plaintiff and the defendants.

¶11

The present suit has been filed inter alia seeking permanent injunction restraining infringement of the trademark, passing off, unfair trade practice, rendition of accounts, damages, etc. against the defendants for adoption and use of the infringing trademark/ corporate name/ trade name ‘HUMANKIND’.

¶12

It is submitted that during the pendency of the present suit, the parties have amicably settled the disputes, terms of which are contained in paragraph 2 of the present application.

¶13

Learned counsel appearing for the parties confirm the terms of the settlement and pray that the suit be decreed, in terms thereof.

¶14

The Court has perused the terms of the settlement and finds the same to be lawful.

¶15

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:13:52

¶16

As per the Settlement Agreement between the parties, the defendants have acknowledged that the plaintiff is the sole and exclusive proprietor of the trademarks ‘MANKIND’ and ‘HUMANKIND S’ and other ‘KIND’ formative trademarks.

¶17

Further, the defendants have agreed and undertaken that they will not use the trademark/ trade name/ corporate name "HUMANKIND" /

¶18

HUMANKIND HEALTH AND HYGIENE PRIVATE LIMITED/ HUMANKIND PHARMACEUTICAL AND LIFESCIENCES PRIVATE LIMITED or any other trademark/ trade name as may be identical to or deceptively similar with the plaintiff’s trademarks ‘MANKIND’, ‘HUMANKIND’ and/or ‘KIND’ formative trademarks.

¶19

Accordingly, the present suit is decreed in favour of the plaintiff and against the defendants in terms of the settlement between the parties, which shall form part of the decree, and in terms of prayers (a) to (f) of the plaint.

¶20

In view of the fact that parties have arrived at a compromise, the Registry of this Court is directed to issue a certificate of refund of Full Court Fees in favour of the plaintiff.

¶21

The parties are bound by the terms of the aforesaid settlement.

¶22

Decree sheet be drawn up.

¶23

Suit along with the pending applications, stands disposed of.

¶24

The next dates of hearing, i.e., 17^th January, 2025 and 22^nd January, 2025, stand cancelled.

¶25

MINI PUSHKARNA, J

¶26

DECEMBER 2, 2024/kr

¶27

This is a digitally signed order.

¶28

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/12/2024 at 12:13:52

Mankind Pharma Limited v. Humankind Health and Hygiene Private Limited & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mankind Pharma Limited v. Humankind Health and Hygiene Private Limited & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Unimrkt Research Pvt. Ltd. Vs Empirico Research Pvt. Ltd. & Ors.

M/S Parshant Zippers Vs M/S Omega Zippers

Countrywide Promoters Private Limited Vs Navraj Infratech Private Limited

M/S Allied Blenders & Distilers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Venkateshwara Distilleries & Anr.

Sh Puneet Kumar Vs Ms Bansal Credits Limited

Cipla Health Limited Vs Syndicate Pharma & Anr.

Aura Synergy India Ltd. & Anr. Vs M/S New Age False Ceiling Co. Pvt. Ltd. & Anrs

M/S Laboratoire Garnier & Cie Vs Pradeep Bhatia & Ors.

Raja Bhandari Vs Naman Arora and Sandeep Garg and Anr.

Countrywide Promoters Private Limited Vs Navraj Infratech Private Limited

M/S Allied Blenders & Distilers Pvt. Ltd. Vs Venkateshwara Distilleries & Anr.

D T Media and Entertainment Private Limited Vs Premchand Palety

Shilpi Rajbhar Vs Patel Music and Films Propertior & Ors.

Puma Se Vs MD Faizan Rashid Owner/ Proprietor of Shoe Lounge and Anr.