The Court granted half refund of court fees to the plaintiff. Remaining refund reserved pending Larger Bench decision. Application disposed of.
Refund of 50% court fees granted; liberty reserved for remaining 50% after Larger Bench decision.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~O-39
DEEPALI DESIGNS & EXHIBITS PRIVATE LIMITED
.....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Raghvendra Sngh and Mr. Abhishek Gupta, Advs.
versus
PICO HONG KONG LIMITED & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Ms. Ginny J. Rautray, Ms. Devika Thakur and Mr. Ranvijay Singh, Advs. for D-1 Mrs. Lakshmi Shanker, Adv. for D-2
CORAM:
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV
% 07.04.2025
I.A. 8922/2025 (under Section 16-A of the Court Fees Act 1870 read with Section 151 CPC, 1908 for refund of the Court fees)
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J APRIL 7, 2025/DPA/SP
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2025 at 15:46:48
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the Court fees should be refunded to the applicant in the case of refund of court fees.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Deepali Designs & Exhibits Private Limited
Pico Hong Kong Limited
Mrs. Lakshmi Shanker
Purushaindra Kumar Kaurav
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
