Tata Sons Private Limited & Anr. v. Goodricke Group Limited
Case brief
What is this about?
This order records a joint application for consent decree filed by plaintiff and defendant in CS(COMM) 683/2024. The High Court of Delhi approved a settlement reached during mediation, dismissed pending stays, and decreed the suit according to the settlement terms.
What did the court decide?
The suit is decreed in terms of the settlement; the application forms part of the decree; all pending applications disposed of.
What the court decided
$~25
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CS(COMM) 683/2024 with I.A. 36282/2024 TATA SONS PRIVATE LIMITED & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr. Achuthan Sreekumar, Mr. Rohil Bansal and Mr. Swastik Bisarya, Advocates.
versus
GOODRICKE GROUP LIMITED .....Defendant Through: Ms. Pooja Dodd and Ms. Rishikar Aggarwal, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 18.11.2024
I.A. 45260/2024 (under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC)
- This is a joint application filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (‘CPC’) on behalf of the plaintiffs and the defendant to record the settlement arrived at between the parties.
- The application bears the signatures of the authorised representatives of the plaintiffs as well as the defendant and their respective counsel. The application is also supported by affidavits of the authorised representatives of the plaintiffs as well as the defendant.
- The parties were referred for mediation on the last date of hearing. They have settled their disputes in the mediation proceedings before Justice Manmohan Singh (Retd.). The terms of the settlement are detailed in paragraph 4 of the application.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to record and decree a settlement arrived at between the parties via mediation.
Coram
Amit Bansal
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court