Plaintiffs sought permanent injunction against YouTubers for defamatory videos. Videos were taken down. Plaintiffs opted not to pursue suit. Court disposed of the suit and pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~20
PRAFUL BILLORE & ANR. .....Plaintiffs Through: Mr Prateek Singh Chaudhary, Advocate.
versus
BAEROJGAR & ORS. .....Defendants Through: Mr Aditya Gupta, Advocate for D-10.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL
O R D E R
% 04.11.2024
CS(COMM) 553/2023
Page 1 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 16:10:20
appearance against whom a decree of permanent injunction has already been passed.
AMIT BANSAL, J
NOVEMBER 4, 2024
tp
CS(COMM) 553/2023
Page 2 of 2
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 16:10:20
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
