Clarification application seeking modification of a compromise decree's court fee refund direction so the refund certificate is issued in favour of plaintiff no.2, an Indian company, instead of both plaintiffs jointly.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~34
versus
GURBACHAN SINGH & ANR. .....Defendants Through:
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT BANSAL O R D E R % 28.10.2024
I.A. 43678/2024 (seeking clarification of the order dated 14.05.2024)
“8. In view of the fact that parties have arrived at a compromise, the Registry is directed to issue a certificate for refund of full court fee, in favour of the Plaintiff No.2 .”
Page 1 of 2
CS(COMM) 513/2020
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/11/2024 at 11:10:26
AMIT BANSAL, J
OCTOBER 28, 2024 /ds
Page 2 of 2
CS(COMM) 513/2020
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/11/2024 at 11:10:26
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court fee refund direction in the decree dated 14.05.2024 should be modified to run in favour of plaintiff no.2.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Flamagas, S.A.
Plaintiff No. 2
Gurbachan Singh
Defendant No. 2
Amit Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
