The Plaintiff sought permission to withdraw a suit alleging disparagement of its 'HORLACKS' product by a competitor's TV commercial. The Court allowed the withdrawal application and dismissed the suit.
Withdrawal of suit allowed; suit dismissed with liberty to file fresh suit in case of similar future incidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~38
HINDUSTAN UNILEVER LIMITED ..... Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Ankur Sangal, Ms. Sucheta Roy and Mr. Kiratraj Sadana, Advocates.
versus
ZYDUS WELLNESS PRODUCTS LIMITED ..... Defendant
Through: Mr. Sagar Chandra and Ms. Ankita Seth, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA O R D E R % 08.01.2024
I.A. 324/2024 (under Order XXIII Rule 1 r/w Section 151 of CPC on behalf of Plaintiff)
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 16:04:09
disposed of.
CS(COMM) 464/2019
SANJEEV NARULA, J
JANUARY 8, 2024 d.negi
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 16:04:09
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
