Vinita Gupta v. Amit Arora
Case brief
What is this about?
Suit settled between plaintiff and defendant; joint consent decree application allowed and suit decreed per settlement terms, with 50% court fee refund certificate issued.
What the court decided
$~41
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CS(COMM) 395/2022 VINITA GUPTA .....Plaintiff Through: Ms. P.C. Arya, Advocate versus
- AMIT ARORA .....Defendant Through: Mr.Ashwani Kumar Sharma &Ms. Divya Ahuja, Advocates
- CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE O R D E R
% 16.07.2024 I.A. 33299/2024(Application filed under Order XXIII Rule 3 read with Section 151 of the CPC)
- This is a joint application on behalf of the plaintiff and the defendant seeking a consent decree based on the terms of the settlement as enumerated in paragraph No.2(i) to 2(vii) of the present application.
- Counsels for the plaintiff and the defendant confirm the settlement and pray that the suit be decreed in terms thereof. The application is duly supported by affidavits of the authorized representatives of the parties. The counsels for the respective parties confirm the terms of the settlement and identify the signatures of their respective clients and pray that the suit be decreed in terms of the settlement, as recorded in paragraph No. 2(i) to 2(vii) of the instant application.
- This Court has perused the terms of the settlement as recorded in paragraph No. 2(i) to 2(vii) of the instant application and finds the same to be lawful. The parties shall remain bound by the terms and conditions of the settlement.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Vinita Gupta
- respondent
Amit Arora
Coram
Saurabh Banerjee
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court