The plaintiff, appearing through counsel, sought withdrawal of the commercial suit due to pending GST issues. The Court allowed the withdrawal and dismissed the suit along with pending applications.
Suit dismissed as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~24
ARUN KUMAR MURARKA .....Plaintiff
Through: Ms. Suman Yadav, Adv. along with Mr. Tushar Jarwal, Mr. Abhishek Chauhan, Mr. Vikrant Maheshwari, Ms. Atishree sood and Mr. Nirvikar Singh, Advs. M: 9711295057
versus
RAJESH SULTANIA & ANR. .....Defendants Through: Mr. Tarun Biswas, Adv. M: 8588969388 Email: [email protected]
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 07.10.2024
MINI PUSHKARNA, J
OCTOBER 7, 2024/kr
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 15:32:31
Arun Kumar Murarka
Rajesh Sultania
Anr
Mini Pushkarna
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
