Akzo Nobel Coatings International B v. Vs Jk Cement Ltd.
Case brief
What is this about?
Delhi High Court recorded a settlement in a trademark infringement suit. The defendant acknowledged the plaintiff's rights and agreed to cease using similar marks and withdraw offensive applications. The suit was decreed in terms of the settlement agreement.
What did the court decide?
Suit decreed based on settlement; trademark registry directed to process withdrawal applications and rectification petitions; unconditional refund of court fees ordered.
What the court decided
$~25
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CS(COMM) 212/2023 & I.A. 38368/2024
AKZO NOBEL COATINGS INTERNATIONAL B V .....Plaintiff
Through: Mr. Prashant Gupta and Jithin M. George, Advocates Mob: 8447349731
versus
JK CEMENT LTD. .....Defendant
Through: Mr. Swapnil Gaur, Adv. M: 9897905254
E-mail- [email protected]
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MINI PUSHKARNA
O R D E R % 04.09.2024
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the suit for trademark injunction should be decreed upon the parties arriving at a settlement.
Whether the trademark registry is directed to process the defendant's withdrawal applications and rectification petition requests.
Whether an unconditional refund of court fees is ordered in light of the compromise between the parties.
Coram
Mini Pushkarna
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court