Civil suit abated due to death of Defendant No. 1 and closure of his proprietorship concern. Plaintiffs failed to seek instructions for impleading legal heirs within the time granted. Court dismissed the suit as abated.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
..... Plaintiffs
Through: Mr. Manish Biala, Advocate.
versus
SURESH PARAB & ANR ..... Defendants
Through: Ms. Adviteeya, Advocate for Proposed Defendants No. 3, 4 and 5.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA
O R D E R % 22.05.2024
SANJEEV NARULA, J
MAY 22, 2024/ sapna
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 14:44:46
Hewlett-Packard Development Company & Ors
Suresh Parab & Anr
Sanjeev Narula
As recorded by the court registry
A suit of a commercial nature above the specified value, governed by the Commercial Courts Act 2015.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
