Disposed

Dish Tv India Ltd. v. Sbl Sales Agency & Ors.

Delhi HC22 Apr 2024CS(COMM)/1017/2018

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court disposed of a civil suit instituted by plaintiff against multiple defendants. Upon observing that the remaining defendants against whom a permanent injunction was sought did not contest, the court granted the decree sought in terms of the plaint and disposed of the suit.

What did the court decide?

Granted decree of permanent injunction in terms of para 51(i) of plaint against defendants 1, 2, 6, 7 & 10. Suit disposed of.

Dish Tv India Ltd. Vs Sbl Sales Agency & Ors. — Execution and Attachment | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~11

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CS(COMM) 1017/2018 & I.A. 9148/2018 DISH TV INDIA LTD. ..... Plaintiff

¶4

Through: Mr. Rohan Swarup and Ms. Tanya Arora, Advocates.

¶5

versus

¶6

SBL SALES AGENCY & ORS. ..... Defendants Through:

¶7

CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL O R D E R % 22.04.2024

¶8

Counsel for plaintiff points out that most of the defendants have either not appeared and some who have filed their written statement have since not appeared.

¶9

The status of the various defendants are as under:

¶10

(i) Defendant nos. 1 and 6 have not appeared and have since been proceeded ex parte by order dated 11^th July, 2019 and 16^th March, 2023 respectively.

¶11

(ii) Defendant no.2 filed their written statement but was not taken on record and accordingly the right was closed on 12^th January, 2022.

¶12

(iii) With respect to defendant no.3, suit has been decreed on 24^th May, 2023. (iv) With respect to defendant no.4, suit has been decreed on 30^th November, 2021.

¶13

(v) With respect to defendant no.5, plaintiff has not pressed for any other

¶14

This is a digitally signed order.

¶15

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/04/2024 at 12:31:53

¶16

relief.

¶17

(vi) Defendant no.7 appeared and filed a written statement but thereafter did not appear and was proceeded ex parte on 16^th March, 2023.

¶18

(vii) With regard to defendant nos. 8,9,11 and 14, the suit has been decreed vide order dated 16^th March, 2023.

¶19

(viii) Defendant no. 10 has been proceeded ex parte and right to file written statement was closed vide order dated 18^th March, 2019.

¶20

(ix) With regard to defendant no.12, the suit was decreed vide order dated 24^th May, 2023.

¶21

(x) Defendant no. 13 is the Ministry of Consumer Affairs, against which no further relief is pressed.

¶22

Accordingly, counsel for plaintiff states that the remaining defendants against which he seeks a decree of permanent injunction are defendant nos. 1,2,6,7&10.

¶23

An ad interim injunction had been passed in favour of plaintiff on 19^th July, 2018.

¶24

In these facts and circumstances, since there is no contest by the remaining defendants, plaintiff is entitled to a decree in terms of para 51(i) of the plaint, in the following terms:

¶25

This is a digitally signed order.

¶26

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/04/2024 at 12:31:53

¶27

Decree sheet be drawn up accordingly in respect of defendant nos. 1,2,6,7&10.

¶28

Suit is accordingly, disposed of. Pending applications, if any, are rendered infructuous.

¶29

Order be uploaded on the website of this Court.

¶30

ANISH DAYAL, J

¶31

APRIL 22, 2024/RK/na

¶32

This is a digitally signed order.

¶33

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/04/2024 at 12:31:53

Dish Tv India Ltd. v. Sbl Sales Agency & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Dish Tv India Ltd. v. Sbl Sales Agency & Ors.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Apnatime Tech Pvt. Ltd. & Anr. Vs Eloquent Info Solutions Private Limited & Anr.

V Guard Industries Ltd. Vs Akash Gupta & Ors.

Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd., and Anr. Vs John Doe and Others

Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs John Doe and Others

Itc Limited Vs Ms. Samita Bhatia Proprietor S.S. Enterprises

Hard Rock Limited Vs Hard Rock Inn Private Limited

Heifer Project International Vs Heifer Project India Trust

Star India Private Limited. & Anr. Vs LIVE4WAP.CLICK & Ors.

Wyeth Llc Vs the Controllers of Patents

Solera Holding Inc. Vs Solera Networks Inc. and Anr.

V Guard Industries Ltd. Vs Akash Gupta & Ors.

Sporta Technologies Pvt. Ltd. and Anr. Vs DREAM7 Entertainment Private Limited and Anr.

Hard Rock Limited Vs Hard Rock Inn Private Limited

Sandisk Llc & Anr. Vs Mahavishnu Mobile Accessories & Anr.