The petitioner challenged dismissal of his criminal appeal against conviction under Section 138 NI Act. The Court noted full payment of compensation and short custody. Conviction was sustained, sentence modified to period served, and petition disposed of.
Sentence modified to reflect period already served; conviction sustained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~44
AMIT GUPTA .....Respondent Through: Mr.Rajiv Kanwar, Advocate (Through VC)
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
O R D E R
% 05.11.2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2024 at 12:03:24
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA, J
NOVEMBER 5, 2024/ Dy/smg..
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/11/2024 at 12:03:24
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the conviction should be sustained given full payment of compensation and short custody period?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
BRIJESH GOSWAMI THR PAROKAR/BROTHER
AMIT GUPTA
DINESH KUMAR SHARMA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
