Revision against an interim maintenance order of the Family Court. Since the petitioner had already filed an application under Section 146 BNSS before the Trial Court seeking modification, with reply filed and matter listed, the High Court disposed of the petition leaving him free to challenge the outcome if aggrieved.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
UMA GUPTA & ANR .....Respondents Through: Mr. R.M. Sinha, Mr. Prateek Mohan Sinha, Ms. Nandini Harsh, Advocates for respondent nos. 1 and 2.
CORAM:
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/11/2024 at 14:22:42
application be considered first. In case the petitioner remains aggrieved, he shall be at liberty to assail the said order.
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
NOVEMBER 19, 2024/ rd
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 25/11/2024 at 14:22:42
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the revision petition challenging interim maintenance should be decided when a Section 146 BNSS modification application is pending before the Family Court.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ankit Aggarwal
Uma Gupta
Anr.
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
