Petitioner sought withdrawal of a criminal revision petition; exemption application allowed and the petition with pending applications was disposed of as withdrawn without any opinion on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~52
SUNITA PANDEY ..... Petitioner
Through: Mr. Aashish George, Advocate
versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for State with SI Suresh Kumar, P.S. New Usmanpur.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
% 01.02.2024
CRL.M.A. 3219/2024 (exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
Application stands disposed of.
CRL.REV.P. 151/2024 & CRL.M.A. 3218/2024 (condonation of delay) & CRL.M.A. 3293/2024 (stay)
After canvassing some arguments, learned counsel for the Petitioner seeks to withdraw the present petition.
Petition along with pending applications is disposed of as withdrawn. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the
merits of the case.
JYOTI SINGH, J
FEBRUARY 01, 2024/kks
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 12:51:54
Sunita Pandey
State NCT of Delhi
Anr.
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
