Mahesh v. Kamlesh
Case brief
What is this about?
The petitioner challenged an interim maintenance order. The High Court declined to interfere, noting it was interim in nature, but directed the Family Court to conclude the matter and pass final orders within one year. The petition was dismissed.
What did the court decide?
Petition dismissed; delay condoned; Family Court directed to conclude matter within one year.
What the court decided
$~43
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.REV.P. 1143/2024
MAHESH .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. Amit Alok, Mr. Saurav Prakash, Mr. Nagender Singh, Mr. Gaurav Prakash, Advocates.
versus
KAMLESH .....Respondent Through:
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
O R D E R % 13.09.2024 CRL.M.A. 27915/2024 (Exemption)
Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
CRL.M.A. 27917/2024
- This application has been filed by the Petitioner seeking condonation of delay of 25 days in filing the present Petition.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the High Court should interfere with an interim maintenance order passed by the Family Court.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MAHESH
- respondent
KAMLESH
Coram
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court