Mukul v. the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a one-line order recording the deposit of cost and dispensing with further proceedings. It decides nothing of general application.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~26
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 9488/2023
- MUKUL ..... Petitioner
Through: Dr. Pradeep Sehrawat and Mr. Umang Sharma, Advocates.
- versus
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for State with SI Vineesha PS Sarojini Nagar.
CORAM:
- HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R
- % 15.01.2024
- Learned counsel for the petitioner states that proof of deposit of cost has been placed on record.
- In view of the above, no further orders are required to be passed.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
MUKUL
- respondent
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR
Coram
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court