Ankit Jain v. State & Anr.
Case brief
What is this about?
Petitioner sought expeditious disposal of a pending matrimonial criminal case. The High Court directed the Trial Court to concluded pending proceedings, particularly under Section 311 Cr.PC, within six months.
What did the court decide?
The petitioner sought expeditious disposal of the case and the High Court directed the Trial Court to conclude the proceedings within six months.
What the court decided
$~4
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
- CRL.M.C. 9419/2023
- ANKIT JAIN ..... Petitioner
- Through: Mr. Arush Bhandari, Advocate.
versus
STATE & ANR ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Naval Kishore Jha, APP for State Respondent No.2 in person.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI
- O R D E R
- % 18.01.2024
- By way of present petition, the petitioner seeks expeditious disposal of the case bearing M.No.197/2017 titled Nidhi Jain v. Ankit Jain pending before Family Judge, Dwarka Court, New Delhi.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the trial court should expedite the pending criminal trial within six months.
Whether an endeavour should be made to conclude proceedings under Section 311 Cr.PC.
Parties & counsel
- petitioner
Ankit Jain
- respondent
State
- other
Respondent No.2
Coram
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court