Disposed

Madhesh @ Madho v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC5 Feb 2024CRL.M.C./864/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court disposal of a petition under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. for cancellation of bail. Court remanded matters to trial court for fresh consideration on merits after issuance of notice to respondent, as the previous dismissal was based only on non-prosecution.

What did the court decide?

Application disposed; pending applications disposed; matter remanded to trial court for fresh consideration on merits after notice to respondent.

Madhesh @ Madho Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr. — Bail and Remand | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~57

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 864/2024

¶4

MADHESH @ MADHO ..... Petitioner Through: Mr.Naveen Gaur, Mr.Kaushlender Singh and Mr.Vijay Kumar, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr.Ajay Vikram Singh, APP.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R

¶9

% 05.02.2024

¶10

CRL.M.A. 3454/2024

¶11

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶12

Application stands disposed of.

¶13

CRL.M.C. 864/2024, CRL.M.A. 3455/2024

¶14

Petition under Section 439(2) read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 („Cr.P.C.‟) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioner for cancellation of bail granted to respondent No.2 vide order dated 18.05.2021 in FIR No. 834/2020 under Sections 307/34 IPC & Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, registered at P.S.: Dabri, Delhi.

¶15

Issue notice. Learned APP for the State appears on advance notice and accepts notice.

¶16

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that an application for cancellation of bail under Section 439(2) Cr.P.C. was preferred before the learned trial court challenging the order granting bail to respondent No.2 on

¶17

This is a digitally signed order.

¶18

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:11:02

¶19

18.05.2021. However, vide order dated 26.10.2023, the aforesaid application was dismissed by the learned trial court since the matter was not pursued by the petitioner. He further submits that the complainant/injured in the present FIR apprehends concern of his safety since respondent No.2 who is a gangster, on arrest in FIR No.292/2023 under Sections 25/27 of the Arms Act, registered at PS Special Cell has disclosed conspiracy to kill the complainant.

¶20

Considering the fact that the application preferred on behalf of the petitioner under Section 439 (2) Cr.P.C. has been dismissed only on the grounds of non-prosecution, it shall be appropriate that the aforesaid application be considered by the learned trial court afresh on merits, after duly issuing the notice to respondent No.2.

¶21

Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stands disposed of.

¶22

A copy of this order be forwarded to learned Trial Court for information and compliance.

¶23

Nothing stated herein shall tantamount to expression on merits of the petition.

¶24

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J

¶25

FEBRUARY 5, 2024/v

¶26

This is a digitally signed order.

¶27

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:11:02

Madhesh @ Madho v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Madhesh @ Madho v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mohd. Akhtar Gujjar Vs the State NCT of Delhi

Hemanth Raj P.V. & Ors. Vs State of Delhi NCT & Anr.

Jitender Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sandeep Jain & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Deepak Jha @ Ravi Vs State Govt.of N.C.T.Delhi

Bharat R. Chaudhary through Yashoda Rana Vs Central Bureau of Investigation