Interim order in a writ petition seeking a sixty-day extension of parole earlier granted to the petitioner. The Court issued notice, sought verification of documents and a report from the State, and extended the parole till the next hearing on existing terms and conditions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
versus STATE (NCT OF DELHI) ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC (criminal) for the State with Mr. Punit Mittal, Advocate. SI Suresh Chand, P.S. Tilak Marg.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT SHARMA
CRL.M.A. 18319/2024 (Exemption)
CRL.M.A. 18318/2024 Extension of parole granted to the petitioner for
a period of sixty (60) days
following prayers:
“a) Pass an order granting extension for a period of sixty (60) days to the petitioner of parole granted vide order dated 09.4.2024;
b) Pass such further order(s) as this Hon'ble Court deems fit and proper.”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:20:04
documents annexed with the present application be verified and a report with regard to the same be placed on record before the next date of hearing.
AMIT SHARMA, J (VACATION JUDGE) JUNE 14, 2024 / bsr
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:20:04
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ajay Kumar Takshak
State (NCT of Delhi)
Amit Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
