Short order dismissing a petition seeking quashing of an FIR under sections 498, 406, and 34 of the BNS. The Court held that contentions did not merit quashing.
Liberty to place pleas before the Trial Court on merits.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~55
SHER SINGH & ANR. .....Petitioner
Through: Ms. Jyoti Khatana, Mr. Dinesh Kumar Sharma, Mr. Vikas Saini, Ms. Kavalpreet Singh, Advocates.
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Digam Singh Dagar, APP for State with SI Chetan, PS: Begumpur.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 19.09.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 11:53:36
The next date before the Court is 24th October, 2024.On this basis, he claims that FIR ought to be quashed.
ANISH DAYAL, J
SEPTEMBER 19, 2024/RK
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 30/09/2024 at 11:53:36
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the FIR under Sections 498/406/34 BNS merits quashing.
Whether the contention that no charges were framed justifies quashing despite pending status.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
SHER SINGH & ANR.
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI AND ANR.
ANISH DAYAL
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
