Quashed

Anuj Kumar and Ors. v. State through SHO Ps Patel Nagar and Anr.

Delhi HC19 Sept 2024CRL.M.C./7383/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Delhi High Court quashed an FIR and related proceedings under sections 498-A and 406 IPC. The petitioners, former husband and in-laws, sought quashing after dissolving their marriage by mutual consent and executing a settlement agreement covering maintenance, dowry, and alimony with full payment made by the petitioner.

What did the court decide?

FIR No. 605/2022 and all subsequent proceedings arising therefrom were quashed and closed.

Anuj Kumar and Ors. Vs State through SHO Ps Patel… — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~50

¶2

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 7383/2024

¶4

ANUJ KUMAR AND ORS

¶5

.....Petitioners

¶6

Through: Mr. Sanjit Kumar, Advocate with petitioners in court.

¶7

versus STATE THROUGH SHO PS PATEL NAGAR AND ANR

¶8

.....Respondents Through: Ms. Shubhi Gupta, APP for the State with SI Bijender Singh, P.S.: Patel Nagar.

¶9

CORAM:

¶10

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 19.09.2024

¶11

CRL.M.A. 28166/2024

¶12

Exemption granted, subject to just exceptions.

¶13

The application stands disposed-of.

¶14

CRL. M.C. 7383/2024

¶15

By way of the present petition filed under section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita 2023, the petitioners, who are the former husband and in-laws of the complainant/respondent No.2, seek quashing of case FIR No.605/2022 dated 09.10.2022 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (‘IPC’) at P.S.: Patel Nagar, Central Delhi.

¶16

Page 1 of 4

¶17

CRL.M.C. 7383/2024 This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:03:04

¶18

The petition is premised on Memorandum of Understanding dated 05.01.2024; and Divorce Decree dated 19.03.2024, which is the culmination of petitions under sections 13B(1) and 13B(2) of the Hindu Marriage Act 1955, whereby the parties had sought dissolution of their marriage by mutual consent.

¶19

The petition is supported by affidavits of the petitioners, as also of respondent No.2, alongwith proof of their I.D.s.

¶20

Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 are present in court. Petitioners Nos. 2 to 4 have joined the proceedings via video-conferencing. Their credentials have been verified and they have also been identified by their respective counsel.

¶21

Petitioner No.1 and respondent No.2 have confirmed that one child, namely Master Viraj, was born from the wedlock, who is ‘minor’ as of date.

¶22

No appeal is stated to have been filed from the divorce decree.

¶23

The court has queried respondent No.2, who confirms that she has taken divorce by mutual consent; and that a memorandum of understanding has been entered into between the parties; and that in full-and-final settlement of all her claims including towards maintenance (past, present and future), stridhan , dowry articles, jewellery, permanent alimony, etc., she was to receive a sum of Rs.2,80,000/-from petitioner No.1; out of which Rs. 1,00,000/- was paid earlier and 02 demand drafts in the sum of Rs.90,000/- each (one in the name of respondent No.2 and another in the name of their minor son) have been handed-over to respondent No.2 in court today, in compliance of the terms of the memorandum of understanding.

¶24

Page 2 of 4

¶25

¶26

Respondent No. 2 confirms that all aspects of the settlement have now been performed.

¶27

Ms. Shubhi Gupta, learned APP confirms that the State has no objection to the subject FIR being quashed.

¶28

In the circumstances, in line with the law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh vs. State of Punjab &Anr. reported as (2012) 10 SCC 303 as also in Narinder Singh &Ors. vs. State of Punjab &Anr. reported as (2014) 6 SCC 466, this court sees no reason why the subject FIR and all proceedings emanating therefrom should not be quashed. This court is of the view that in light of the settlement between the contesting parties, continuing with the subject FIR and all subsequent proceedings would be an exercise in futility and would not be conducive to peace and harmony between the parties.

¶29

Accordingly, FIR No. 605/2022 dated 09.10.2022 registered under sections 498-A/406/34 of the IPC at P.S.: Patel Nagar, Central Delhi is quashed. All proceedings arising therefrom also stand closed.

¶30

Though as per the agreement between the parties, the custody of the minor son, Master Viraj, is to remain with respondent No.2, it is clarified that such agreement will not affect the rights of the child to interact and engage with his father, as he may decide, subject to logistical convenience of the parties.

¶31

Needless to add that the settlement between the parties leading to the closure of all criminal proceedings by way of the present order will also in no way affect the property rights and other rights of the minor child vis-à-vis his father, as may be available under law, in any manner whatsoever.

¶32

Page 3 of 4

¶33

¶34

Petition stands disposed-of.

¶35

Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.

¶36

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J

¶37

SEPTEMBER 19, 2024 ds

¶38

Page 4 of 4

¶39

CRL.M.C. 7383/2024

¶40

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:03:04

Anuj Kumar and Ors. v. State through SHO Ps Patel Nagar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Anuj Kumar and Ors. v. State through SHO Ps Patel Nagar and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Baljeet Babbar & Ors. Vs the State through SHO Ps. Mukherjee Nagar, Delhi & Anr.

Ashu Kashyap Vs the Stategovt of NCT of Delhi Anr.

Aslam Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Harsh Arora Vs State NCT of Delhi

Jitender Kumar Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi

Rohit@Ashwin Vs State NCT of Delhi