Petition in a cheque dishonour matter, withdrawal allowed. The petitioner sought leave to withdraw the petition with liberty to pursue remedies before the learned Magistrate under S.138 NI Act.
Leave to withdraw the petition granted with liberty to pursue remedies before the learned Magistrate.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~45
versus
THE STATE (GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI) & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Mr. Utkarsh, APP for the State. Mr. Nitesh Goyal, Ms. Prakriti Anand, Ms. Lisa Sankrit, Adovcates for Respondent No. 2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 13.09.2024
After making brief submissions in the matter, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks leave to withdraw the present petition, with liberty to pursue his remedies before the learned Magistrate in the proceedings under section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act 1881, as may be available, in accordance with law.
The petition is accordingly disposed-of as withdrawn, with liberty as prayed-for, without making any observations on the merits of the matter. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
SEPTEMBER 13, 2024 V.Rawat
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 09:18:22
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Deepak Gupta
Second Respondent
The State
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
