A writ petition sought directions to provide police security to petitioners threatened over an inter-faith marriage. The State agreed to treat the petition as a complaint, offer protection if needed, and share the Beat Officer's contact. The petition was disposed of without further orders.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~75
GAYATRI AND ANOTHER ..... Petitioners Through: Mr. Akshit Tomar, Advocate
versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Ms. Rupali Bandhopadhya, ASC with Mr. Abhijeet Kumar, Advocate for the State with SI Ankur Kumar, PS Govindpuri
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 27.02.2024
CRL.M.A. 6223/2024 (exemption)
W.P.(CRL) 665/2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/02/2024 at 11:26:38
the petitioners visited the police station in this regard.
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
FEBRUARY 27, 2024 ‘hkaur’
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 29/02/2024 at 11:26:38
1 issue framed by the court
Whether police protection should be directed for a couple facing threats from the family after an inter-faith marriage.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Gayatri
The State of NCT of Delhi
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
