Petitioner sought quashing of a complaint case for offences under Sections 406/420/467/120B IPC, noting a civil suit on the same facts had been decreed. Counsel sought permission to withdraw the petition, which the court permitted and disposed of along with pending applications.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~25
BANARSI DEVI .....Petitioner
Through: Mr. S.C. Sagar, Ms. Asha, Mr. Naeem and Ms. Swati, Advocates
versus
THE STATE (GNCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Ms. Priyanka Dalal, APP for the State.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R
% 13.08.2024 1. Petition under Section 482 Cr.P.C., 1973 has been filed on behalf of the petitioner for quashing of the Complaint Case No. 1381/2021 for the alleged offences under Sections 406/420/467/120B IPC pending in the Court of the learned CMM, Saket Courts, New Delhi.
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
AUGUST 13, 2024/PT
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 16/08/2024 at 11:40:28
1 issue framed by the court
Should the complaint case under Sections 406/420/467/120B IPC be quashed given a civil suit on the same facts was decreed?
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Banarsi Devi
The State (GNCT of Delhi)
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
