Allowed

Karan Arora & Ors. v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi HC25 Jan 2024CRL.M.C./621/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of FIR No.0447/2019 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC after parties settled through mediation, dissolved their marriage by mutual consent divorce, and the former husband paid Rs.1,75,000 in full settlement. The State raised no objection. The Court quashed the FIR and consequential proceedings.

What did the court decide?

FIR No.0447/2019 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC at PS Palam Village and all consequent proceedings quashed.

Karan Arora & Ors. Vs State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr. — Dowry and Cruelty | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~37

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 621/2024

¶4

KARAN ARORA & ORS. ..... Petitioners

¶5

Through: Mr D. K. Pandey and Mohd. Sarik, Advocates along with petitioners in person.

¶6

versus

¶7

STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Hemant Mehla, APP for the State with SI Sandeep Yadav, PS Palam Village. Respondent no.2 in person.

¶8

CORAM:

¶9

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN

¶10

O R D E R

¶11

% 25.01.2024

¶12

CRL.M.A. 2594/2024

¶13

Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. CRL.M.C. 621/2024

¶14

The present petition has been filed under Section 482 CrPC seeking quashing of FIR No.0447/2019 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Palam Village and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom on the ground that the parties have arrived at a settlement.

¶15

Issue notice. The learned APP for the State accepts notice. He submits that since the FIR is an outcome of a matrimonial dispute and the parties have arrived at a settlement, the State has no objection in case the FIR in question is quashed.

¶16

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:28:16

¶17

The petitioner no.1 (former husband), and petitioner nos.2 and 3, who are close relatives of the petitioner no.1, as well as, respondent no. 2 (former wife) are present in the Court and they have been identified by the learned counsel for the petitioners and by the Investigating Officer SI Sandeep Yadav, PS Palam Village.

¶18

The brief facts of the case are that the marriage between the petitioner no.1 and respondent no. 2 was solemnized on 20.04.2017 according to Hindu Rites and Customs. No child was born out of the said wedlock.

¶19

On account of temperamental issues certain disputes arose between the parties and they started living separately since February, 2019. The dispute between the parties also led to the registration of present FIR.

¶20

During the pendency of the proceedings, the parties were referred to Mediation Centre, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi, where they arrived at a settlement, terms whereof were reduced in writing in the form of Settlement dated 05.07.2023, which is annexed as Annexure-C to the present petition.

¶21

In terms of the said settlement, the parties decided to dissolve their marriage by filing a petition for divorce by way of mutual consent. Accordingly, the petitioner no.1 and respondent no.2 have obtained a decree of divorce dated 22.09.2023, which is annexed as Annexure-D to the present petition.

¶22

It is a term of the settlement between the parties that the petitioner no.1 shall pay a total sum of Rs.1,75,000/- to the respondent no.2 towards full and final settlement of all her claims on account of streedhan , permanent alimony, dowry articles, maintenance (past, present and future) etc. Out of the said amount, a sum of Rs.1,20,000/- has already been paid by the petitioner no.1 to the respondent no.2 in the manner as mentioned in the

¶23

¶24

settlement. The remaining amount has been paid to the respondent no.2 today in the Court by the petitioner no.1 in the following manner:-

¶25

(i) Rs.48,000/- by way of Demand Draft; and

¶26

(ii) Rs.7,000/- has been paid through UPI.

¶27

The receipt of entire amount of Rs.1,75,000/- is acknowledged by the respondent no.2, who is present in court.

¶28

The respondent no.2, on a query put by the Court, states that she has no objection in case the FIR is quashed.

¶29

In view of the fact that the parties have arrived at a settlement, no useful purpose will be served in continuing the proceedings, rather the same would create further acrimony between them.

¶30

It is, thus, in the interest of justice that the present FIR and all the other proceedings emanating therefrom be quashed.

¶31

Consequently, the petition is allowed and the FIR No.0447/2019 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at Police Station Palam Village alongwith all other proceedings emanating therefrom, is quashed.

¶32

The petition stands disposed of in the above terms.

¶33

Order be uploaded on the website of this court.

¶34

VIKAS MAHAJAN, J

¶35

JANUARY 25, 2024 MK

¶36

This is a digitally signed order.

¶37

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/06/2024 at 11:28:16

Karan Arora & Ors. v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Karan Arora & Ors. v. State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shantanu Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Vijay Yadav & Anr. Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Manoj Kumar Singh Vs State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi)

Shashank Singh Vs the State (Govt of NCT of Delhi)

Pradeep Kumar & Anr. Vs the State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Dinesh Kumar & Ors. Vs the State (Govt of NCT of Delhi) & Anr.