Writ petition under Article 226 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking three months' parole. Counsel and petitioner did not appear despite prior notice; the petition was dismissed for non-prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~33
versus
GOVT OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for State with SI Abhishek, PS: Special Cell.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
O R D E R
JYOTI SINGH, J
APRIL 02, 2024/shivam
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/04/2024 at 12:12:20
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ajay Kumar
Govt of NCT of Delhi
Jyoti Singh
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
