Petitioner sought cancellation of anticipatory bail granted in an FIR where investigation concluded, charges framed, and trial commenced. Court dismissed petition as no purpose served. Pending application rendered infructuous.
Petition dismissed; pending application rendered infructuous.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~58
Through: Mr. U.S. Gautam, Advocate. versus
THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. .....Respondent Through: Mr. Amit Ahlawat, APP for the State with SI Suresh Bhatia, PS: Timarpur. Mr. Arun Khatri, Ms. Shelly Dixit and Mr. Sumit, Advocate for respondent no.2.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANISH DAYAL
O R D E R % 16.12.2024
ANISH DAYAL, J
DECEMBER 16, 2024/RK
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/12/2024 at 11:38:03
Victim X
The State (NCT of Delhi)
Anish Dayal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
