Disposed

Mrs. Malti Gupta v. the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Delhi HC16 Feb 2024W.P.(CRL)/549/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner filed a writ petition under Article 226 read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. seeking directions for initiating action against Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary and protecting her from dire consequences. State submitted that notice was issued. Court disposed of the petition along with the miscellaneous application by notice.

What did the court decide?

Petition disposed of along with miscellaneous application by issue of notice.

Mrs. Malti Gupta Vs the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr. — Writ and Judicial Review | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~85

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- W.P.(CRL) 549/2024, CRL.M.A. ________/2010 (To be numbered)

¶4

MRS. MALTI GUPTA ..... Petitioner Through: Petitioner in person.

¶5

versus THE STATE (NCT OF DELHI) & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Ashvini Kumar and Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Advocates alongwith SI Lal Chand, P.S. V.K. South.

¶6

CORAM:

¶7

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI O R D E R

¶8

% 16.02.2024

¶9

By way of present petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C., the petitioner seeks following prayers :-

¶10

“(a) Allow the present writ petition;

¶11

(b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the Respondent No.2 to initiate actions on the complaint of the Petitioner and to provide protection to the Petitioner from dire consequences;

¶12

(c) Issue directions to the Bar Council of India to cancel the license to practise of Mr. Ram Singh Chaudhary till the final disposal of the present writ petition;

¶13

(d) Pass any other order/relief/direction in favour of the Petitioner as this Hon'ble Court deems fit, just and proper

¶14

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/02/2024 at 14:51:04

¶15

according to fact and circumstance of the present case.”

¶16

Issue notice.

¶17

Insofar as, prayer (a) and (b) are concerned, Mr. Amol Singh, learned ASC for the State submits that mobile number of Beat Officer as well as SHO of P.S. Vasant Kunj South has been provided to the petitioner. He further submits that in case any complaint is received from the petitioner, the same would be looked into in accordance with law.

¶18

Insofar as, prayer (c) is concerned, petitioner, who is present in Court, states that she would seek remedy in accordance with law.

¶19

In view of the above, petition is disposed of alongwith miscellaneous application.

¶20

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶21

FEBRUARY 16, 2024 ga

¶22

Mrs. Malti Gupta v. the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mrs. Malti Gupta v. the State (Nct of Delhi) & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Saurabh Bhatia and Others Vs the State and Another

Ekta Tiwari Vs the State & Ors.

Dev Prakash Vs State NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sanjeet Vs Gnct of Delhi and Ors. & Anr.

Gyani Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Priynaka Praveen Vs Commissioner of Police & Ors.

Rahul Gaur & Ors. Vs State (N.C.T. of Delhi) & Anr.

Gulshan Kumar and Ors. Vs State of NCT Delhi and Anr.

Mohd Arakan & Ors. Vs the State NCT of Delhi

M/S Ocean Logistics Vs Nagender Sharma & Anr.

Himanshu Sharma & Ors. Vs State of NCT of Delhi through SHO & Anr.

Vasim@Wasim & Anr. Vs the State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Smt. Bindu Tripathi Vs M/S Jai Ganga Ispat Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.