Disposed

Ayush Arora & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Delhi HC16 Jul 2024CRL.M.C./5348/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court disposed of a writ petition seeking quashing of an FIR and attached proceedings for matrimonial misconduct. Applying Section 528 of the BNSS, the court recorded respondent No.2's firm stand to allegations and granted the withdrawal of the petition by the petitioner's counsel without prejudice to their rights.

What did the court decide?

The petition is accordingly disposed of based on the withdrawal by the learned counsel for the petitioners.

Ayush Arora & Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr. — Matrimonial and Divorce | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~92

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

CRL.M.C. 5348/2024

¶4

A A & ORS. .....Petitioners Through: Mr.H.Rehman and Mr.Raj Kumar, Advocates

¶5

versus

¶6

STATE NCT OF DELHI AND ANR .....Respondents Through: Ms.Manjeet Arya, APP for State with SI Ashish, P. S. Rajouri Garden. Ms.Parul Verma, Advocate with respondent No.2 in person.

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R % 16.07.2024

¶9

CRL.M.A. 20468/2024

¶10

Exemption allowed, subject to just exceptions.

¶11

Application stands disposed of.

¶12

CRL.M.C. 5348/2024

¶13

Petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (‘BNSS’) has been preferred on behalf of the petitioners for quashing of FIR No.0754/2023 under Sections 498A/406/34 IPC registered at P.S.: Rajouri Garden and proceedings emanating therefrom. Sections 376/354/509 IPC have been subsequently invoked by the prosecution.

¶14

Issue notice. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for respondent No.2 alongwith respondent No.2 in person appear on advance notice and accept notice.

¶15

At the outset, learned APP for the State has pointed out that allegations

¶16

This is a digitally signed order.

¶17

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2024 at 11:18:51

¶18

have been levelled by respondent No.2 that she was compelled to drink by accused No.1/petitioner No.1- AA (husband of respondent No.2) for making physical relations with her brother-in-law i.e., accused No.4/petitioner No.3 who had a bad eye on her. She further informs that supplementary chargesheet is to be filed.

¶19

On a specific query put to respondent No.2 that in case, the allegations have been leveled out of matrimonial differences, respondent No.2 stands by the allegations.

¶20

At this stage, in view of stand taken on behalf of respondent No.2, learned counsel for petitioners seeks to withdraw the petition without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioners.

¶21

Petition is accordingly disposed of. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.

¶22

ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J

¶23

JULY 16, 2024/v

¶24

This is a digitally signed order.

¶25

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 20/07/2024 at 11:18:51

Ayush Arora & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Ayush Arora & Ors. v. State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Prem Shankar Gupta Vs the State (N.C.T of Delhi)

Suman Vijay Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Amit Vs State NCT of Delhi

Amit Agrawal and Ors. Vs the State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Ajay Taneja Vs M/S Wahi Jewellers

Sh. Chander Prakash Vs the State NCT of Delhi and Anr.