Petition under Section 482 CrPC sought quashing of a Section 138 complaint and summoning order. Counsel withdrew it after arguments with liberty to pursue revision against the impugned order; contentions left open.
Permission to withdraw the petition with liberty to seek remedy before the Revision Court; contentions left open.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~65
ASHOK KUMAR GUPTA .....Petitioner
Through: Counsel for petitioner (appearance not given)
versus
M/S KAUTILYA FINANCE BV .....Respondent Through: Mr Satinder Singh Bawa, APP for the State. Mr. Arshdeep Singh Khurana, Ms. Tannavi Sharma and Mr. M.Khanna, Advocates.
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA
O R D E R % 15.07.2024
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2024 at 14:05:56
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
JULY 15, 2024/rs
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 18/07/2024 at 14:05:56
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the complaint under Section 138 NIA Act and the summoning order dated 05.09.2023 could be quashed under Section 482 CrPC.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Ashok Kumar Gupta
M/s Kautilya Finance BV
Neena Bansal Krishna
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
