The petitioner's counsel did not press the petition after the respondent stated there was no settlement between the parties. The Court disposed of the petition without prejudice to the petitioner's rights and contentions.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~4
Through: Mr.Pradeep Kumar, Mr.Anshul Dokhoria, Ms. Anailu Hakung, Mr. Dani Uja and Mr. Surender Kumar, Advocates.
THE STATE AND ANR & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr.Yudhvir Singh Chauhan, APP Respondent No.2 through VC.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA O R D E R
% 24.07.2024
After partly making submissions, learned counsel for the petitioner does not press the petition, since respondent No.2 (through VC) submits that there is no settlement between the parties.
Taking the statement of learned counsel for the petitioner on record, petition is accordingly disposed of without prejudice to the rights and contentions of the petitioner. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of.
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA, J
JULY 24, 2024/v
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 02/07/2025 at 12:10:28
VISHNU GIR
THE STATE AND ANR
ANOOP KUMAR MENDIRATTA
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
