Disposed
Parvesh Mann v. State
Delhi HCCRL.A./47/2022
Case brief
AI extract
What is this about?
Appeal against an order on charge in a criminal case; with the trial already at the prosecution evidence stage and five witnesses examined, counsel stated the appeal had become infructuous and it was disposed of as infructuous.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
$~34
¶2
- IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
¶3
- CRL.A. 47/2022
¶4
PARVESH MANN ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Deepshikha, Advocate.
¶5
versus
¶6
STATE ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Sanjeev Bhandari, ASC for State with Ms. Anvita Bhandari, Mr. Kunal Mittal, Mr.Arjit Sharma, Mr. Vaibhav Vats, Advocates and Insp. Ravi Tushir, PS: Special Cell.
¶7
CORAM: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE JYOTI SINGH
¶8
O R D E R % 04.04.2024
¶9
- Learned counsel for Appellant states that the Appellant had assailed the order on charge in the present Appeal, however, the matter is at the stage of prosecution evidence before the Trial Court and 5 prosecution witnesses have been examined. Thus the present appeal has become infructuous.
¶10
- Appeal stands disposed of as infructuous.
¶11
JYOTI SINGH, J
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Parvesh Mann
- respondent
State
Coram
AI extract
Jyoti Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court