The Delhi High Court directed the State to decide the petitioner's application for the first spell of furlough within one week and disposed of the writ petition.
Directed the respondents to decide the petitioner's application for furlough within one week from today.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~37
RAJESH RAJA ..... Petitioner Through: Mr Naiem J. Heena, Advocate (DHCLSC) with Mr Raj Kumar, Ms Ritu Garg and Mr Vishnu Gupta, Advocates.
versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel for the State with Ms Priyam Aggarwal, Advocate for the State with Insp. Sunny Kumar, SI Gaurav Kumar, Police Station Rajinder Nagar.
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 05.01.2024
CRL.M.A. 406/2024
W.P.(CRL) 46/2024
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 15:19:57
furlough was made by the petitioner as early as on 27.09.2023 but till date the respondent has not passed any order on the same.
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
JANUARY 5, 2024 MK
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 15:19:57
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to direct the respondent to decide the petitioner's application for furlough within a specified time frame.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Rajesh Raja
State of NCT of Delhi
Vikas Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
