Petitioner sought a writ regarding his furlough application, filed only on 21.12.2023. The State's counsel undertook to decide it within two weeks. The court found no orders necessary and dismissed the petition with liberty to file afresh if any grievance remained.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~60
SHANTANU ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Rajive Maini and Ms. Shriya Maini, Advs. versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.) with Ms. Priya Rai, Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Jatin and Mr. Aashish Chojar, Advs. with SI Sanjay, P.S. Lahori Gate
CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE AMIT MAHAJAN
O R D E R
% 05.01.2024
CRL.M.A. 402/2024 (for exemption from filing certified copies of the annexures)
W.P.(CRL) 45/2024
AMIT MAHAJAN, J
JANUARY 5, 2024/ “SK”
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 06/05/2024 at 15:20:01
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the court should intervene when the State undertook to decide the petitioner's pending furlough application within two weeks.
Shantanu
State of NCT of Delhi
Amit Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
