The High Court held that the Special Leave Petition, filed after the petitioners had been acquitted, had become infructuous and is consequently dismissed. No legal principle was laid down.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~29
Through: Mohd. Shamikkh and Mr. Absar Ahmad, Advs.
STATE OF DELHI AND ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Satish Kumar, APP for the State along with Mr. Chaman Prakash, Mr. Amit Chaudhary, Mr. Ashok Kr. Shukla and Mr. Lalit Kumar, Advocates
CORAM:
HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE SWARANA KANTA SHARMA
SWARANA KANTA SHARMA, J
MAY 1, 2024/A
Click here to check corrigendum, if any
This is a digitally signed order.
The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 03/05/2024 at 12:50:52
Khalid & Ors.
State of Delhi & Ors.
Swarana Kanta Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
