Dismissed

Naveen Kumar Jindal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Delhi HC4 Sept 2024CRL.M.C./4019/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioner seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondents. Dispute arises regarding payment of the 9th instalment under a settlement deed to quash an FIR. Respondent agreed to deposit the amount with the court. Petitions disposed upholding the impugned order.

What did the court decide?

Petitions dismissed. No interference with anticipatory bail granted to respondents.

Naveen Kumar Jindal Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr. — Anticipatory Bail | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~5 and 6

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

- CRL.M.C. 4019/2024 and CRL.M.A. 15301/2024

¶4

NAVEEN KUMAR JINDAL .....Petitioner

¶5

Through: Mr.Shaurya R.Rai, Advocate

¶6

versus STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Nawal Kishore Jha, APP for State with SI Deepak Panwar Mr.Sandeep Kapur and Mr.Saurav Mishra, Advocates for respondent No.2

¶7

- CRL.M.C. 4085/2024 and CRL.M.A. 15522/2024

¶8

NAVEEN KUMAR JINDAL .....Petitioner

¶9

Through: Mr.Shaurya R.Rai, Advocate

¶10

versus

¶11

STATE OF NCT OF DELHI & ANR. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Laksh Khanna, APP for State with SI Deepak Panwar Mr.Sandeep Kapur and Mr.Saurav Mishra, Advocates for respondent No.2

¶12

CORAM:

¶13

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI

¶14

O R D E R

¶15

% 04.09.2024

¶16

By way of present petitions, the petitioner seeks cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to respondent No.2/ Deepak Kapoor in CRL.M.C. 4019/2024 and respondent No.2/ Vartik Kapoor in CRL.M.C. 4085/2024

¶17

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2024 at 12:13:42

¶18

arising out of FIR No.96/2023, registered under Sections 406/420/465/467/468/471/120B/34 IPC at P.S. Barakhamba Road, Delhi vide order dated 15.03.2024, on the ground that the respondents’ have failed to abide by the terms of the Settlement Deed dated 11.12.2023.

¶19

Learned counsel for the petitioner has referred to paragraph 3 of the aforesaid Settlement Deed, wherein a total of 9 tranches of payments are mentioned. He submits that though 8 instalments have been released, the 9^th instalment is withheld by the respondents.

¶20

Learned counsel for the private respondents submits that the parties have entered into the aforesaid settlement, which provided that the parties would file a petition seeking quashing of the FIR. Since no steps have been taken by the petitioner for the same, the 9^th instalment has not been released. He, on instructions, further submits that the said settlement was arrived at between the parties for quashing of the FIR against all the accused persons. The said submission is, however, disputed by the learned counsel for the petitioner, who submits that the settlement was only between the parties thereto.

¶21

At this stage, learned counsel for the private respondents submits that respondent No.2 does not wish to withhold the 9^th instalment and the same would be deposited with the Registrar General of this Court within two days from today.

¶22

Considering that there is some dispute between the parties on the aspect of whether the settlement is arrived at between the petitioners and all the accused persons or only between the parties herein, let the amount of the 9^th instalment be deposited with the Registrar General of this Court within two days from today, subject to the final outcome of the proceedings

¶23

This is a digitally signed order.

¶24

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2024 at 12:13:42

¶25

pending between the parties. The amount so deposited shall be kept in the form of an FDR on auto renewal mode.

¶26

In view of the above, no ground is made for interference with the impugned order. The present petitions are disposed of alongwith the pending applications.

¶27

MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J

¶28

SEPTEMBER 4, 2024

¶29

¶30

This is a digitally signed order.

¶31

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 09/09/2024 at 12:13:42

Naveen Kumar Jindal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Naveen Kumar Jindal v. State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vikas Vs State of NCT of Delhi

Smt Sudesh Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Sumit Sethi Vs State of NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Romain Ranciere Vs Central Bureau of Investigation and Anr. & Anr.

Brijpal and Anr. Vs State NCT of Delhi and Anr.

Gaurav Pratap Singh & Ors. Vs the State through SHO Ps. Shalimar Bagh & Anr.