The petitioner sought quashing of an FIR. The responding counsel submitted that the petitioner had not been charge-sheeted and no L.O.C. was issued. The court deemed the petition infructuous and disposed of the matter as withdrawn.
Petition disposed of as withdrawn.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~61
SATYENDRA PRAKASH AGARWAL & ANR. .....Petitioners
Through: Ms. Sweta Rani, Ms. Rekha Giri and Ms. Ritika Khanna, Advocates.
versus
CENTRAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATON & ORS.
.....Respondents Through: Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj, SPP-CBI With Inspector Sumit Nonia, H10, CBI with Mr. Vishal Sharma and Mr. Ujjwal Chaudhary, Advocates.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI O R D E R % 25.09.2024
Ms. Anubha Bhardwaj, learned SPP appearing for the CBI on instruction of Mr. Sumit Nonia, the Investigating Officer in the subject FIR submits, that petitioner No.1, viz. Mr. Satyendra Prakash s/o Shri Daya Prakash Aggarwal, has not been charge-sheeted in the matter; and accordingly, the prayer made in the present petition seeking quashing of the subject FIR is infructuous.
Ms. Bhardwaj also confirms that no Look Out Circular has been issued against petitioner No. 1.
For the record, petitioner No. 1 was a director in petitioner No. 2/M/s Daya Sugar, which was a unit of M/s Daya Engineering Works (Sleeper) Ltd.
Page 1 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 390/2020
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:29:42
In the circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave to withdraw the present petition as having been rendered infructuous. Petition is accordingly disposed-of as withdrawn. Pending applications, if any, also stand disposed-of.
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
SEPTEMBER 25, 2024 ss
Page 2 of 2
W.P.(CRL) 390/2020
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 04/07/2025 at 04:29:42
Satyendra Prakash Agarwal & Anr.
Central Bureau of Investigation & Ors.
Anup Jairam Bhambhani
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
