The Court disposed of the writ petition seeking quashing of complaints where the State counsel submitted that complaints were closed after inquiry found no cognizable offence was made out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
$~55
versus STATE GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI & ORS. ..... Respondents Through: Mr Amol Sinha, ASC for State with Mr Kshitiz Garg, Mr Ashvini Kumar and Ms Chavi Lazarus, Advocates. Ms Fozia Rehman, Advocate for R-2 to R-4.
CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VIKAS MAHAJAN
O R D E R % 09.04.2024
VIKAS MAHAJAN, J
APRIL 9, 2024/MK
This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 15/04/2024 at 12:13:09
Naim Ahmed Ansari & Ors.
State Govt. of NCT of Delhi & Ors.
Vikas Mahajan
As recorded by the court registry
A constitutional writ petition in a criminal context, most commonly habeas corpus or a challenge to an FIR or detention order.
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
