Dismissed

Mayank Rajput and Others v. Union of India and Others

Delhi HC19 Nov 2024W.P.(CRL)/3599/2024

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Petitioners challenged their detention by the CGST Department alleging illegal arrest and jurisdictional overreach. The petitioners sought withdrawal. The Court, considering the maintainability plea, allowed withdrawal and dismissed the petition as not pressed.

What did the court decide?

Petition allowed to be withdrawn; disposed of as not pressed with liberty to approach appropriate forum.

Mayank Rajput and Others Vs Union of… — Constitutional and Fundamental Rights | Delhi HC (2024)

¶1

$~60

¶2

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

¶3

W.P.(CRL) 3599/2024, CRL.M.A. 34458/2024 MAYANK RAJPUT & ORS .....PETITIONERS Through: Mr. Ajay Kumar and Mr. Jalaj Panwar, Advs

¶4

Versus

¶5

UNION OF INDIA & ORS .....RESPONDENTS

¶6

Through: Ms. Arunima Dwivedi, CGSC with Mr. Aakash Pathak, GP Mr. Atul Tripathi, SSC, CBIC with Mr. V.K. Attri, Adv alongwith Sh. Sujeet Kumar, I.O

¶7

CORAM:

¶8

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE REKHA PALLI HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAURABH BANERJEE

¶9

O R D E R % 19.11.2024

¶10

By virtue of the present Writ Petition, the petitioners seek the following reliefs:

¶11

“ i. Release the petitioner if the detention is found to be illegal or unconstitutional, issue Writ like Habeas Corpus. ii. Mandate compliance with CCTV recording directives and preservation of footage. iii. Pass such order(s) as this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, like Habeas Corpus. Additional Relief: Fix personal accountability of the officers and order department inquiry and lodging a criminal complaint for taking the law into their own hands, violating constitutional rights, right to privacy, and fabricating documents, etc.”

¶12

It is the petitioners’ case that petitioner nos. 1 and 2 have been unlawfully detained by the CGST Department, Ghaziabad without following the due process of law. It is their plea that even though the petitioners have been carrying out business in Delhi, proceedings have been initiated against

¶13

This is a digitally signed order.

¶14

The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/11/2024 at 12:32:36

¶15

them by the Department in Ghaziabad and Meerut which it is urged amounts to jurisdictional overreach.

¶16

Learned CGSC, appearing on advance notice on behalf of the respondent no.1/ Union of India at the outset raises an issue of maintainability of the present Writ Petition before this Court, primarily since the arrest with which the petitioners are aggrieved, were made pursuant to an order dated 25.10.2024 passed by the Chief Judicial Magistrate, Meerut, Uttar Pradesh. In the light of this plea of the respondents, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that instead of pressing the present petition, the petitioners will approach the Apex Court or any other appropriate Court as may be advised and therefore, seeks to withdraw the same.

¶17

In view thereof, especially taking into account the respondents’ plea, we allow the prayer of the learned counsel for the petitioners and dispose of the present petition as not pressed with liberty to approach the appropriate forum/ Court, making it clear that it will be open for the petitioners to avail of all appropriate remedies, as per law.

¶18

Furthermore, since we have not expressed any opinion on the merits of the grounds raised in the present petition, it will be open for the petitioners to raise all grounds permissible in law, including grounds raised in the present petition in any fresh proceedings which they may choose to initiate.

¶19

REKHA PALLI, J

¶20

SAURABH BANERJEE, J

¶21

NOVEMBER 19, 2024/Ab

¶22

This is a digitally signed order. The authenticity of the order can be re-verified from Delhi High Court Order Portal by scanning the QR code shown above. The Order is downloaded from the DHC Server on 21/11/2024 at 12:32:36

Mayank Rajput and Others v. Union of India and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Mayank Rajput and Others v. Union of India and Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashfaq@Shabbu Vs State Govt of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Nitesh Bhardwaj Vs State of NCT of Delhi & Anr.

Kushneet Kumar Vijray Vs State Govt NCT of Delhi

Rachna & Ors. Vs the Commissioner of Police Delhi

Aanchal Aggarwal Vs Commissioner of Police and Others

Mohit Singh and Ors. Vs State and Ors.

Matrix Cellular International Services Limited and Ors. Vs State NCT of Delhi

Ravneet Kour Vs State (Nct of Delhi)

Hina Bashir Beigh Vs National Investigation Agency

Javed Ali @ Javed Vs National Investigation Agency

Pabbar Giri @Vijay Vs Union of India and Ors.

Sirnam Vs State of Gnct Delhi

Smt.Soni Devi Vs State Govt. of NCT of Delhi and Ors.

Nowa Bai & Anr. Vs State