i) PW-2 stated that the deceased was son of his brother-in-law, cobrother ( Sadhu ). He deposed that the deceased was married to the Appellant 1 ½ years ago from the date of his death and was residing with her at jhuggi . As per this witness, co-accused, Akbar and Niyaz, were friends of the deceased, who were living in the same locality. This witness states that ten days before 06th November, 1999 (date on which body of the deceased was discovered), the deceased came to him and had told him that co-accused, Niyaz, had developed illicit relationship with the Appellant. To this, PW-2 reverted that he would try and make her understand. He further stated that thereafter, deceased had told him that his wife had told him that Niyaz was like her brother and there was no relationship between the two of them. He further states that on 05th November, 1999, after closing shop at around 10 P.M., he went to meet the Appellant and her husband in order to make her understand. When he reached near “drum-wala ” bridge ( pul ), near bank of Yamuna, he saw that co-accused, Niyaz and Akbar, were going towards bank of Yamuna. As per this witness, when he went further towards Mool Chand Basti , he met the Appellant and deceased, and the deceased told him that he has no danger from the aforesaid co-accused persons and he was living nicely and that they had taken the meal and were going towards river for a stroll. This witness stated that he went back and next day he came to know about a dead body lying at the bank of Yamuna River and at around 01:00 P.M., he and his brother-in-law, Sagir (PW-3), went to see the dead body and identified to be that of Naushad.
